Market wage premium and publications of tenured faculty at Universidad de Costa Rica

Published: 2026-03-09

Main Article Content

Authors

Introduction


Current Costa Rican policies on wage erosion for the public sector threaten to weaken the services provided including those related to research in academia.


 


Objective


The paper analyses the association between alternative wages and wage premiums with the number of publications by academic staff.


 


Methodology


This paper uses administrative data on the academic publications of tenured faculty at Universidad de Costa Rica to examine, using a Tobit regression analysis, the existing relationship between academic output and the opportunity cost that different people face in the labour market.  Opportunity costs are imputed from wage equations estimated from the National Household Surveys.


 


Results


The findings indicate sizable differences in the wage premiums associated with the disciplines of study in the Costa Rican labour market: while physical education or nursing receive a wage penalty, careers in law or medicine report wages that are 40% above the average wage of other graduates.  This higher labour market premium correlates with fewer academic publications, which suggests that people might respond to these higher opportunity costs by prioritizing alternative work opportunities. The results also confirm that the time it takes to get tenure is negatively associated with the number of publications.


 


Conclusions


Results highlight the potential for improving the institutional hiring policies by facilitating research activities for non-tenured faculty as well as the potential weakening of research activities due to the wage erosion policies.

1.
Blanco LC. Market wage premium and publications of tenured faculty at Universidad de Costa Rica. soc.eco [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 9 [cited 2026 Mar. 9];(57). Available from: https://sociedadyeconomia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/sociedad_y_economia/article/view/14688

Asamblea Legislativa (2018) Ley de Fortalecimiento de las Finanzas Públicas 9635. La Gaceta 225 del 4 de diciembre de 2018.

Asamblea Legislativa (2022) Ley Marco de Empleo Público 10 159. La Gaceta 46 del 9 de marzo de 2022.

Babcock, L., Recalde, M. P., Vesterlund, L., & Weingart, L. (2017). Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. American Economic Review, 107(3), 714–747. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141734.

Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., & Zinovyeva, N. (2017). Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? American Economic Review, 107(4), 1207–1238. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151211.

Barbezat, D. A. (2006). Gender differences in research patterns among PhD economists. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(3), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.3.359-375.

Bertrand, M. (2011) Chapter 17 - New perspectives on gender. En: Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol. 4, Part B. Elsevier, 1543-1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02415-4.

Biasi, B. & Sarsons, H. (2022). Flexible wages, bargaining, and the gender gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137 (1), 215–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab026.

Blanco, L. C. (2018). Relación entre la segregación de género en las disciplinas de estudio universitarias y el empleo de las personas graduadas en Costa Rica. Revista de Ciencias Económicas, 36 (1),9-27. https://doi.org/10.15517/rce.v36i1.33850.

Blanco, L. C. (2023a). Engañadas por la academia: una revisión del estatus de las mujeres en la academia. Revista de Ciencias Económicas, 41(1), e51726. https://doi.org/10.15517/rce.v41i1.51726.

Blanco, L. C. (2023b). Diferenciales salariales de género y sus determinantes para el personal académico titular en la Universidad de Costa Rica. Revista de Ciencias Económicas, 41(2), e52311. https://doi.org/10.15517/rce.v41i2.52311.

Blanco, L.C. (2023c) La mujer académica en su (j)aula. En: Rojas Peralta, S. (ed.) Elizabeth Muñoz Filósofa. Puntarenas: Editorial de la Sede del Pacífico, Universidad de Costa Rica, 39-77.

Blanco, L. C. (2024). Un lanzar de dados: la evaluación de la producción académica del personal académico titular en la Universidad de Costa Rica. Revista de Ciencias Económicas, 42(1), e52565. https://doi.org/10.15517/rce.v42i1.52565.

Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using Stata, revised edition. Stata Press.

Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W.M. (2014). Women in academic science: a changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236.

Consejo Nacional de Rectores [CONARE] (2024) Distribución del FEES. Monto acordado del FEES y la transferencia a la UTN, relación con el PIB nominal y tasas de crecimiento, 2010-2024 (millones de colones). https://siesue.conare.ac.cr/monto-acordado-fees-2010-2024/

De Paola, M., & Scoppa, V. (2015). Gender discrimination and evaluators’ gender: evidence from Italian academia. Economica, 82(325), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12107.

European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, & European Education and Culture Executive Agency. (2017). Modernisation of Higher Education in Europe: Academic Staff – 2017 (Eurydice Report). https://doi.org/10.2797/408169.

Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2004). Women in Economics: moving up or falling off the academic career ladder? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162386.

Glover, J. (2000). Women and scientific employment (J. Campling, Ed.). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981085.

Goldin, C. (2002) A pollution theory of discrimination: male and female differences in occupations and earnings, Working paper 8985. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Hakim, C. (2002). Lifetime preferences as determinants of women’s differentiated labour market careers. Work and Occupations, 29(4), 428-459. https: //doi. org/10.1177/0730888402029004003.

Hengel, E. (2017). Publishing while female: are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review (Cambridge Working Paper Economics, No 1753). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.17548.

Ibarra, M. E., & Castellanos Llanos, G. (2009). Género y educación superior. Un análisis de la participación de las mujeres como profesoras en la Universidad del Valle. La manzana de la discordia, 4(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.25100/lamanzanadeladiscordia.v4i1.1476

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos [INEC]. (2021). Encuesta Nacional de Hogares 2011-2021 (con códigos ocupacionales COCR-2011 a cuatro dígitos). INEC.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos [INEC]. (2022). Encuesta Nacional de Hogares 2022. INEC.

Jabbaz, M., Samper-Gras, T., & Díaz, C. (2019). La brecha salarial de género en las instituciones científicas. Estudio de caso. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 80, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v26i80.11248.

Manning, A. and Swaffield, J. (2008) The gender-gap in early-career wage growth. The Economic Journal 118 (530), 983-1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02158.x.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology [MIT]. (1999a). Special edition: a study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. The MIT faculty newsletter, XI, 4.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1999b). A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. http://web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.pdf

McElroy, M. B. (2013). The 2013 Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession. American Economic Association. https://web.archive.org/web/20221209214545/https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=701

Mincer, J. (1970) The distribution of labour incomes: a survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 8 (1), 1-26.

Murray, D., Siler, K., Larivière, V., Chan, W. M., Collings, A. M., Raymond, J., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2019). Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/400515.

Sarsons, H. (2017). Recognition for group work: gender differences in academia. American Economic Review, 107(5), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171126.

Toope, S. (2019). University of Cambridge: Gender pay gap report 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20221213200932/https://www.equality.admin.cam.ac.uk/files/gender_pay_gap_report_2018_final_2.pdf

Universidad de Costa Rica (2024a) Ejecución Presupuestaria. https://transparencia.ucr.ac.cr/rendicion-de-cuentas/presupuestos/ejecucion-presupuestaria/pagina-1.html

Universidad de Costa Rica (2024b) Estadísticas del sector - Recursos Humanos. https://transparencia.ucr.ac.cr/datos-abiertos/datos-abiertos/estadisticas-del-sector-recursos-humanos.html

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.